Regarding non-invasive skin tightening treatments, two popular options often come to mind: Ultraformer III and Ulthera. Both employ the HIFU technology for mechanical skin lifting and collagen promotion or production to affect skin laxity.
As much as Ultraformer III and Ulthera are similar in their working mechanisms and the results, some particularities would allow one to recommend one treatment more than the other to an individual or for particular skin issues. In this article, we unpack all that you need to know about Ultraformer vs Ulthera so that you can make the right choice.
Ultraformer III
It is well known as HIFU and Ultraformer III, a cutting-edge skin-tightening technology designed to provide energy-sequenced ultrasound towards the SMAS layer of the skin. This can lift the skin by making it contract while at the same time encouraging the production of collagen.
Ultraformer III can be divided into three treatments: Sub-specialties include micro-focused, macro-focused, and MMFU, which stands for micro and macro-focused ultrasound. Both sorts involve varying skin depths and are designed to tighten different skin and reduce fat plate.
It is also important to know that Ultraformer III has outstanding performance and can be applied to both the face and neck. It can penetrate different levels of the skin and is thus useful not only in face lifts but also in other areas such as the neck, arms, and abdomen.
Also, Ultraformer III treatment is not as painful during the process as most HIFU treatments, so it is more comfortable for the patient.
Ulthera: Precision and Longevity
Another excellent skin-tightening procedure that is equally popular is the Ulthera, which employs ultrasound energy to create collagen. As with Ultraformer III, Ulthera directs power to the SMAS layer to create a lifting action.
Nevertheless, the technology applied by Ulthera is different from other alternatives using MFU-V (Microfocused Ultrasound with Visualization), which means that the practitioner has a live vision of the skin layers during the treatment. Another advantage of Ulthera is that the effects are long-lasting; in some cases, patients may experience the result for up to one year.
This makes it one of the best treatments for those who need a one-shot solution and a long-lasting result. The procedure can be somewhat painful compared to the earlier cases because of the increased focal size of energy waves.
Selection Between Ultraformer vs Ulthera
The comparison between Ultraformer and Ulthera depends on certain factors, such as skin problems and tolerance to pain. The Ultraformer III is a go-to for patients who are more sensitive but want the ability to target multiple sections of the face and neck.
On the other hand, Ulthera is ideal for those people who require accurate and permanent treatment.
